On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 11:36 AM Andrew Stubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ping.
OK.
> On 31/07/2025 12:15, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> > The NoOffload flag was introduced recently (commit "Don't pass vector params
> > through to offload targets").
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * doc/options.texi: Document NoOffload.
> > ---
> > gcc/doc/options.texi | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/doc/options.texi b/gcc/doc/options.texi
> > index b46b9977da8..25cd2bcb797 100644
> > --- a/gcc/doc/options.texi
> > +++ b/gcc/doc/options.texi
> > @@ -529,6 +529,12 @@ code generation.
> > @item Param
> > This is an option that is a parameter.
> >
> > +@item NoOffload
> > +This option will not be passed through from the host compiler to any
> > offload
> > +target compilers via the LTO mechanism. It is intended for use with
> > +optimization tuning parameters where settings appropriate for the host
> > system
> > +are likely to harm the performance of the offload device.
> > +
> > @item Undocumented
> > The option is deliberately missing documentation and should not
> > be included in the @option{--help} output.
>
