Hi Joseph,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 06:57:23PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2025, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>
> > @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ declaration}, and it serves the purpose of making the
> > name @code{len}
> > known when the declaration of @code{data} is parsed.
> >
> > You can write any number of such parameter forward declarations in the
> > -parameter list. They can be separated by commas or semicolons, but the
> > +parameter list. They can be separated by commas, and the
>
> The existence of an option to warn about a particular case of an extension
> is certainly not a reason to remove documentation of that case!That documentation was never very clear. It doesn't for example say that eacch ';' constitutes a new list of parameter declarations (which is important, as you can't repeat a parameter in the same list). Being so badly documented, I considered it okay-ish to remove it as if it had never existed. Alternatively, I should write proper documentation for it, mentioning the differences of using ',' and ';'. I'll prepare a revised patch with that. Cheers, Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es> Use port 80 (that is, <...:80/>).
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
