Am 07.10.25 um 22:24 schrieb Jerry D:
On 10/7/25 1:13 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Dear All,
the attached patch addresses a rather old (> 14 years) issue.
We generated warnings for standard conforming code, where a symbol
was given a bind(c) attribute and at the same time declared PRIVATE.
I checked a bunch of compilers, and none gave warnings, except for
NAG, which did warn, but only if the binding name were the same as
the default name.
I considered this to be a good solution, and decided to "hide" the
warning behind -Wsurprising (contained in -Wall).
What do others think?
Attached has been regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
Thanks,
Harald
I think your approach is very reasonable. It gets rid of noise that
users do not need, very OK by me.
Jerry
Thanks for the support, Jerry.
I'll wait for 24h for other opinions before proceeding.
Harald
