Hi!

This is another case of the issue that save_expr shouldn't be called
when parsing C (except for in_late_binary_op), but c_save_expr must be
called instead.

I wonder if we shouldn't add a langhook, which would do
if (in_late_binary_op) save_expr_1 else c_save_expr 
and ensure that when not parsing in_late_binary_op is set or something
similar, and if non-NULL, call the langhook from save_expr.

Anyway, this patch fixes this issue even without such changes,
bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk/4.7?

2012-08-31  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c/54428
        * c-convert.c (convert): Don't call fold_convert_loc if
        TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT of a COMPLEX_TYPE is the same, unless e
        is a COMPLEX_EXPR.  Remove TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT check from
        COMPLEX_TYPE -> COMPLEX_TYPE conversion.

        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr54428.c: New test.

--- gcc/c/c-convert.c.jj        2012-06-29 21:22:02.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/c/c-convert.c   2012-08-31 10:25:55.265821242 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* Language-level data type conversion for GNU C.
    Copyright (C) 1987, 1988, 1991, 1998, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2008,
-   2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+   2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
 This file is part of GCC.
 
@@ -92,7 +92,9 @@ convert (tree type, tree expr)
 
   STRIP_TYPE_NOPS (e);
 
-  if (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type) == TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (expr)))
+  if (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type) == TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (expr))
+      && (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (expr)) != COMPLEX_TYPE
+         || TREE_CODE (e) == COMPLEX_EXPR))
     return fold_convert_loc (loc, type, expr);
   if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (expr)) == ERROR_MARK)
     return error_mark_node;
@@ -135,24 +137,23 @@ convert (tree type, tree expr)
         but for the C FE c_save_expr needs to be called instead.  */
       if (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (e)) == COMPLEX_TYPE)
        {
-         tree subtype = TREE_TYPE (type);
-         tree elt_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (e));
-
-         if (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (elt_type) != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (subtype)
-             && TREE_CODE (e) != COMPLEX_EXPR)
+         if (TREE_CODE (e) != COMPLEX_EXPR)
            {
+             tree subtype = TREE_TYPE (type);
+             tree elt_type = TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (e));
+
              if (in_late_binary_op)
                e = save_expr (e);
              else
                e = c_save_expr (e);
              ret
-               = fold_build2 (COMPLEX_EXPR, type,
-                              convert (subtype,
-                                       fold_build1 (REALPART_EXPR,
-                                                    elt_type, e)),
-                              convert (subtype,
-                                       fold_build1 (IMAGPART_EXPR,
-                                                    elt_type, e)));
+               = fold_build2_loc (loc, COMPLEX_EXPR, type,
+                                  convert (subtype,
+                                           fold_build1 (REALPART_EXPR,
+                                                        elt_type, e)),
+                                  convert (subtype,
+                                           fold_build1 (IMAGPART_EXPR,
+                                                        elt_type, e)));
              goto maybe_fold;
            }
        }
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr54428.c.jj    2012-08-31 
10:27:51.941225923 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr54428.c       2012-08-31 
10:27:09.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+/* PR c/54428 */
+
+typedef double _Complex C;
+
+C
+foo (C x, C y, double z, C w)
+{
+  return y - z * __builtin_cpow (x, 75) * w;
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to