This time with the actual patch attached.
On 31 August 2012 15:23, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 24 August 2012 10:54, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 24 August 2012 10:40, Richard Earnshaw <rearn...@arm.com> wrote: >>> >>> Has this been tested for big-endian? >>> >>> R. >> >> No. I'll give a look at it and let you know. >> >> Christophe. > > Here is an updated patch, which now does no optimization in the > big-endian case. Given the current status of big-endian + neon > support, I guess it is not a serious problem. > > I have also added runtime tests. > > I will later post an additional patch (on top of this one), which > enhances the tests so that they can be run in big-endian mode too. > > Christophe. > > 2012-08-31 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> > > gcc/ > * config/arm/arm.c (arm_evpc_neon_vext): New > function. > (arm_expand_vec_perm_const_1): Add call to > arm_evpc_neon_vext. > > > gcc/testsuite/ > * gcc.target/arm/neon-vext.c > gcc.target/arm/neon-vext-execute.c: > New tests.
gcc-vec-permute-vext.patch
Description: Binary data
