Pushed to mainline as r16-5044. Thanks for the review and testing.
Paul On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 at 20:16, Jerry D <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11/4/25 6:23 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > It turned out that attempting to pick out specific interfaces for PDT > > constructors in primary.cc was way too early. This caused a problem in > > ASSOCIATE blocks simply because the associate name and its selector > > are not usable until resolution. > > > > This patch detects the presence of more than one symbol in the generic > > interface and the absence of a second arglist to defer the selection > > of the appropriate specific constructor until resolution. > > > > The changes are straightforward as are the tests. > > > > Regtested on FC43/x86_64. OK for mainline? > > > > Paul > > This also fixes pr105542. > > Tested and reviewed here OK and on our joint test machine. > > OK for mainline >
