On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 6:54 AM Andrew MacLeod <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 11/5/25 04:55, Richard Biener wrote:
> > This clarifies the constraints of the immediate use iterators,
> > documenting how exactly stmts and their immediate uses might be
> > altered during it.
> >
> > I have bootstrapped and tested the series on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
> > the prerequesites have been pushed.
> >
> > Does this look OK?  If so I'll go ahead with this (and expect some
> > fallout, but there's now the tools to fixup reasonably easy).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Richard.
> >
> >       * doc/tree-ssa.texi: Update immediate use iterator
> >       documentation.
> >       * ssa-iterators.h: Likewise.
> > ---
> >   gcc/doc/tree-ssa.texi | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >   gcc/ssa-iterators.h   |  8 ++++----
> >   2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/doc/tree-ssa.texi b/gcc/doc/tree-ssa.texi
> > index 25aa006d48e..670571e1cb0 100644
> > --- a/gcc/doc/tree-ssa.texi
> > +++ b/gcc/doc/tree-ssa.texi
> > @@ -383,11 +383,34 @@ under the iterators, so use the 
> > @code{FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT} and
> >   sanity of the use list by moving all the uses for a statement into
> >   a controlled position, and then iterating over those uses.  Then the
> >   optimization can manipulate the stmt when all the uses have been
> > -processed.  This is a little slower than the FAST version since it adds a
> > -placeholder element and must sort through the list a bit for each 
> > statement.
> > -This placeholder element must be also be removed if the loop is
> > -terminated early; a destructor takes care of that when leaving the
> > -@code{FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT} scope.
> > +processed.  Only the current active @code{imm_use_p} may be altered
> > +when using an inner @code{FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_ON_STMT} iteration.
> > +You have to be careful to not inadvertedly modify the immediate
> > +use list by working on another stmt than the the current @code{stmt} during
> > +the iteration.  In particular calling @code{update_stmt} is destructive
> > +on all SSA uses immediate use lists related to the updated stmt.
> > +This slower than the FAST version since it sorts through the list for each
> > +statement.
> > +
> > +@code{FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_ON_STMT} iteration may not be nested inside
> > +another @code{FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_ON_STMT} or @code{FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_FAST}
> > +iteration of the same immediate use list.
> > +
> > +There is the @code{gather_imm_use_stmts} helper that trades memory for
> > +removing the need to care about the immediate use list consistency and
> > +which also avoids duplicate visiting of stmts that can occur with
> > +@code{FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_FAST} when there are multiple uses of an SSA name
> > +on a stmt.  This can be used to iterate safely over all use stmts like
> > +this:
> > +
> > +@smallexample
> > +  tree ssa_var;
> > +
> > +  for (gimple *use_stmt : gather_imm_use_stmts (ssa_var))
> > +    @{
> > +       // do something with use_stmt
> > +    @}
> > +@end smallexample
> >
> I was going to suggest some clarification here, but as I worked through
> it, im not sure how to make it much clearer. :-P
>
> I think the changes are all good.
Likewise. This definitely clarifies things for me in a nice and simple way.

Thanks,
Andrew

>
> Andrew
>
> >   There are checks in @code{verify_ssa} which verify that the immediate use 
> > list
> >   is up to date.
> > diff --git a/gcc/ssa-iterators.h b/gcc/ssa-iterators.h
> > index d6bd15c8ade..47220c5ce25 100644
> > --- a/gcc/ssa-iterators.h
> > +++ b/gcc/ssa-iterators.h
> > @@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
> >      Safe iteration via FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_STMT and FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_ON_STMT
> >      allows insertion, deletion, and modification of SSA operands within
> >      the current stmt iterated.  The iterator manages this by re-sorting
> > -   the immediate uses to batch uses on a single stmt after each other
> > -   and inserts a marker node into the list immediately after the node
> > -   ending the current batch.  This marker node is uniquely identified by
> > -   having null stmt *and* a null use pointer.  */
> > +   the immediate uses to batch uses on a single stmt after each other.
> > +   If using an inner FOR_EACH_IMM_USE_ON_STMT iteration only the active
> > +   use may be manipulated.  Safety relies on new immediate uses being
> > +   inserted at the front of immediate use lists.  */
> >
> >   struct imm_use_iterator
> >   {
>

Reply via email to