Hi Xi,
> On Tue, 2026-01-06 at 10:30 +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Hi Xi,
>>
>> > On Tue, 2026-01-06 at 09:54 +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> > > The gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-43.c test currently FAILs on 32 and 64-bit
>> > > SPARC:
>> > >
>> > > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-43.c scan-tree-dump-times forwprop1
>> > > "VEC_PERM_EXPR" 10
>> > >
>> > > The dump has no reference to VEC_PERM_EXPR, so the scan needs to guarded
>> > > by vect_perm.
>> >
>> > It will need to be moved to vect/ directory then. See
>> > https://gcc.gnu.org/PR113418.
>>
>> I see. I can do that in a v2 for this case. The other instances should
>> be moved separately, I think.
>
> Yes, it's just we should prevent introducing new uses of vect_* out of
> vect/ and gcc.target/. The existing cases can be fixed separately.
I've just checked: there are currently 138 of those: though the change
is mechanical, it will require careful testing. However, about half of
those are below gdc.dg. Maybe those should be handled differently.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
