Hi Richard,
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2026, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
>> Two tests FAIL on 32 and 64-bit SPARC:
>>
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bool-2.c scan-tree-dump vect "optimized: loop
>> vectorized"
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bool-cmp-4.c scan-tree-dump vect "optimized: loop
>> vectorized"
>>
>> The dump shows
>>
>> gcc.dg/vect/vect-bool-2.c:12:12: missed: not vectorized: relevant stmt not
>> supported: y_7 = _1 <= 16;
>>
>> so the test needs vect_bool_cmp.
>
> <= 16 suggests a comparison in type char, not bool tough. There's no
> effective target for compares in general it seems? But indeed we
> might read that as "QImode compare"? Given that's what
> vect-bool-cmp-2.c requires for example. That also requires
> bool-cmp mask to bool vec_cond_mask.
>
> It would be so nice if the effective target names would map to
> optabs (or combinations of those).
very true: unless you're intimately familar with vectorization, it's
quite some guesswork which effective-target to use currently.
> So...
>
>> Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11.
>>
>> Ok for trunk?
>
> OK.
Installed, thanks.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
