On 20/11/2025 15:59, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2025 at 15:50, Richard Earnshaw (foss)
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/08/2025 18:30, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>> We get lots of error messages when compiling arm_neon.h under
>>> e.g. -mcpu=cortex-m55, because Neon builtins are enabled only when
>>> !TARGET_HAVE_MVE.  This has been the case since MVE support was
>>> introduced.
>>>
>>> This patch uses an approach similar to what we do on aarch64, but only
>>> partially since Neon intrinsics do not use the "new" framework.
>>>
>>> We register all types and Neon intrinsics, whether MVE is enabled or
>>> not, which enables to compile arm_neon.h.  However, we need to
>>> introduce a "switcher" similar to aarch64's to avoid ICEs when LTO is
>>> enabled: in that case, since we have to enable the MVE intrinsics, we
>>> temporarily change arm_active_target.isa to enable MVE bits.  This
>>> enables hooks like arm_vector_mode_supported_p and arm_array_mode to
>>> behave as expected by the MVE intrinsics framework.  We switch back
>>> to the previous arm_active_target.isa immediately after.
>>>
>>> With a toolchain targetting e.g. cortex-m55,
>>> gcc.target/arm/attr-neon3.c now compiles successfully, with only one
>>> failure to be fixed separately:
>>> FAIL: gcc.target/arm/attr-neon3.c check-function-bodies my1
>>>
>>> Besides that, gcc.log is no longer full of errors messages when trying
>>> to compile arm_neon.h if MVE is forced somehow.
>>>
>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>>       * config/arm/arm-builtins.cc (arm_init_simd_builtin_types): Remove
>>>       TARGET_HAVE_MVE condition.
>>>       (class arm_target_switcher): New.
>>>       (arm_init_mve_builtins): Remove calls to
>>>       arm_init_simd_builtin_types and
>>>       arm_init_simd_builtin_scalar_types.  Switch to MVE isa flags.
>>>       (arm_init_neon_builtins): Remove calls to
>>>       arm_init_simd_builtin_types and
>>>       arm_init_simd_builtin_scalar_types.
>>>       (arm_need_mve_mode_regs): New.
>>>       (arm_need_neon_mode_regs): New.
>>>       (arm_target_switcher::arm_target_switcher): New.
>>>       (arm_target_switcher::~arm_target_switcher): New.
>>>       (arm_init_builtins): Call arm_init_simd_builtin_scalar_types and
>>>       arm_init_simd_builtin_types.  Always call arm_init_mve_builtins
>>>       and arm_init_neon_builtins.
>>> ---
>>>
>>> This was also posted to the experimental forge: 
>>> https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-TEST/pulls/63
>>>
>>>  gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.cc | 161 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>  1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.cc b/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.cc
>>> index 3bb2566f9a2..78ba044a891 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.cc
>>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
>>>  #include "basic-block.h"
>>>  #include "gimple.h"
>>>  #include "ssa.h"
>>> +#include "regs.h"
>>>
>>>  #define SIMD_MAX_BUILTIN_ARGS 7
>>>
>>> @@ -1105,37 +1106,35 @@ arm_init_simd_builtin_types (void)
>>>       an entry in our mangling table, consequently, they get default
>>>       mangling.  As a further gotcha, poly8_t and poly16_t are signed
>>>       types, poly64_t and poly128_t are unsigned types.  */
>>> -  if (!TARGET_HAVE_MVE)
>>> -    {
>>> -      arm_simd_polyQI_type_node
>>> -     = build_distinct_type_copy (intQI_type_node);
>>> -      (*lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type) (arm_simd_polyQI_type_node,
>>> -                                              "__builtin_neon_poly8");
>>> -      arm_simd_polyHI_type_node
>>> -     = build_distinct_type_copy (intHI_type_node);
>>> -      (*lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type) (arm_simd_polyHI_type_node,
>>> -                                              "__builtin_neon_poly16");
>>> -      arm_simd_polyDI_type_node
>>> -     = build_distinct_type_copy (unsigned_intDI_type_node);
>>> -      (*lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type) (arm_simd_polyDI_type_node,
>>> -                                              "__builtin_neon_poly64");
>>> -      arm_simd_polyTI_type_node
>>> -     = build_distinct_type_copy (unsigned_intTI_type_node);
>>> -      (*lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type) (arm_simd_polyTI_type_node,
>>> -                                              "__builtin_neon_poly128");
>>> -      /* Init poly vector element types with scalar poly types.  */
>>> -      arm_simd_types[Poly8x8_t].eltype = arm_simd_polyQI_type_node;
>>> -      arm_simd_types[Poly8x16_t].eltype = arm_simd_polyQI_type_node;
>>> -      arm_simd_types[Poly16x4_t].eltype = arm_simd_polyHI_type_node;
>>> -      arm_simd_types[Poly16x8_t].eltype = arm_simd_polyHI_type_node;
>>> -      /* Note: poly64x2_t is defined in arm_neon.h, to ensure it gets 
>>> default
>>> -      mangling.  */
>>> -
>>> -      /* Prevent front-ends from transforming poly vectors into string
>>> -      literals.  */
>>> -      TYPE_STRING_FLAG (arm_simd_polyQI_type_node) = false;
>>> -      TYPE_STRING_FLAG (arm_simd_polyHI_type_node) = false;
>>> -    }
>>> +  arm_simd_polyQI_type_node
>>> +    = build_distinct_type_copy (intQI_type_node);
>>> +  (*lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type) (arm_simd_polyQI_type_node,
>>> +                                          "__builtin_neon_poly8");
>>> +  arm_simd_polyHI_type_node
>>> +    = build_distinct_type_copy (intHI_type_node);
>>> +  (*lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type) (arm_simd_polyHI_type_node,
>>> +                                          "__builtin_neon_poly16");
>>> +  arm_simd_polyDI_type_node
>>> +    = build_distinct_type_copy (unsigned_intDI_type_node);
>>> +  (*lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type) (arm_simd_polyDI_type_node,
>>> +                                          "__builtin_neon_poly64");
>>> +  arm_simd_polyTI_type_node
>>> +    = build_distinct_type_copy (unsigned_intTI_type_node);
>>> +  (*lang_hooks.types.register_builtin_type) (arm_simd_polyTI_type_node,
>>> +                                          "__builtin_neon_poly128");
>>> +  /* Init poly vector element types with scalar poly types.  */
>>> +  arm_simd_types[Poly8x8_t].eltype = arm_simd_polyQI_type_node;
>>> +  arm_simd_types[Poly8x16_t].eltype = arm_simd_polyQI_type_node;
>>> +  arm_simd_types[Poly16x4_t].eltype = arm_simd_polyHI_type_node;
>>> +  arm_simd_types[Poly16x8_t].eltype = arm_simd_polyHI_type_node;
>>> +  /* Note: poly64x2_t is defined in arm_neon.h, to ensure it gets default
>>> +     mangling.  */
>>> +
>>> +  /* Prevent front-ends from transforming poly vectors into string
>>> +     literals.  */
>>> +  TYPE_STRING_FLAG (arm_simd_polyQI_type_node) = false;
>>> +  TYPE_STRING_FLAG (arm_simd_polyHI_type_node) = false;
>>> +
>>>    /* Init all the element types built by the front-end.  */
>>>    arm_simd_types[Int8x8_t].eltype = get_typenode_from_name (INT8_TYPE);
>>>    arm_simd_types[Int8x16_t].eltype = get_typenode_from_name (INT8_TYPE);
>>> @@ -1445,14 +1444,29 @@ arm_init_cde_builtins (void)
>>>      }
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +/* RAII class for enabling enough features to define built-in types
>>> +   and implement the arm_mve.h pragma.  */
>>> +class arm_target_switcher
>>
>> I don't particularly like the name of this class, given the very limited 
>> functionality that it has (the current name tends to imply that it is far 
>> more generic).
>>
> well, it's largely a copy / paste from the aarch64 version, called....
> aarch64_target_switcher :-)
> 
> I kept the name similar so that intrinsics implementations are close
> enough, and also in case we need it later for Neon intrinsics for
> instance.
> 
>> Perhaps something that more directly implies that it is forcing MVE for 
>> adding types would be more appropriate, like
>>
>>   arm_force_tgt_for_mve_types
> 
> MVE is currently the only user, but the class itself is generic.
> 

OK.

This was always a pretty weak objection...

R.

> Thanks,
> 
> Christophe
> 
>>
>> But I'm open to alternative suggestions.
>>
>> R.
>>
>>> +{
>>> +public:
>>> +  arm_target_switcher (const enum isa_feature *flags);
>>> +  ~arm_target_switcher ();
>>> +
>>> +private:
>>> +  sbitmap m_old_arm_active_target_isa;
>>> +  bool m_old_general_regs_only;
>>> +  tree m_old_target_pragma;
>>> +  bool m_old_have_regs_of_mode[MAX_MACHINE_MODE];
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>  /* Set up all the MVE builtins mentioned in arm_mve_builtins.def file.  */
>>>  static void
>>>  arm_init_mve_builtins (void)
>>>  {
>>>    volatile unsigned int i, fcode = ARM_BUILTIN_MVE_PATTERN_START;
>>>
>>> -  arm_init_simd_builtin_scalar_types ();
>>> -  arm_init_simd_builtin_types ();
>>> +  enum isa_feature mve_flags[] = { ISA_MVE_FP, isa_nobit };
>>> +  arm_target_switcher switcher (mve_flags);
>>>
>>>    /* Add support for __builtin_{get,set}_fpscr_nzcvqc, used by MVE 
>>> intrinsics
>>>       that read and/or write the carry bit.  */
>>> @@ -1496,14 +1510,6 @@ arm_init_neon_builtins (void)
>>>  {
>>>    unsigned int i, fcode = ARM_BUILTIN_NEON_PATTERN_START;
>>>
>>> -  arm_init_simd_builtin_types ();
>>> -
>>> -  /* Strong-typing hasn't been implemented for all AdvSIMD builtin 
>>> intrinsics.
>>> -     Therefore we need to preserve the old __builtin scalar types.  It can 
>>> be
>>> -     removed once all the intrinsics become strongly typed using the 
>>> qualifier
>>> -     system.  */
>>> -  arm_init_simd_builtin_scalar_types ();
>>> -
>>>    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE (neon_builtin_data); i++, fcode++)
>>>      {
>>>        arm_builtin_datum *d = &neon_builtin_data[i];
>>> @@ -1690,6 +1696,65 @@ arm_init_fp16_builtins (void)
>>>                                              "__fp16");
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +/* Return true if MMODE is an MVE mode.  */
>>> +static bool
>>> +arm_need_mve_mode_regs (int mmode)
>>> +{
>>> +  return (bitmap_bit_p (arm_active_target.isa, isa_bit_mve)
>>> +       && (VALID_MVE_MODE ((machine_mode) mmode)
>>> +           || VALID_MVE_STRUCT_MODE ((machine_mode) mmode)
>>> +           || VALID_MVE_PRED_MODE ((machine_mode) mmode)));
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* Return true if MMODE is a NEON mode.  */
>>> +static bool
>>> +arm_need_neon_mode_regs (int mmode)
>>> +{
>>> +  return (bitmap_bit_p (arm_active_target.isa, isa_bit_neon)
>>> +       && (VALID_NEON_QREG_MODE ((machine_mode) mmode)
>>> +           || VALID_NEON_DREG_MODE ((machine_mode) mmode)));
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* Temporarily set FLAGS as the enabled target features.  */
>>> +arm_target_switcher::arm_target_switcher (const enum isa_feature *flags)
>>> +  : m_old_general_regs_only (TARGET_GENERAL_REGS_ONLY),
>>> +    m_old_target_pragma (current_target_pragma)
>>> +{
>>> +  m_old_arm_active_target_isa = sbitmap_alloc (isa_num_bits);
>>> +  bitmap_copy (m_old_arm_active_target_isa, arm_active_target.isa);
>>> +
>>> +  /* Changing the ISA flags and have_regs_of_mode should be enough here.  
>>> We
>>> +     shouldn't need to pay the compile-time cost of a full target switch.  
>>> */
>>> +  if (! TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT)
>>> +    global_options.x_target_flags &= ~MASK_GENERAL_REGS_ONLY;
>>> +
>>> +  arm_initialize_isa (arm_active_target.isa, flags);
>>> +
>>> +  /* Target pragmas are irrelevant when defining intrinsics artificially.  
>>> */
>>> +  current_target_pragma = NULL_TREE;
>>> +
>>> +  /* Ensure SIMD / VFP regs are available if Neon or MVE is enabled.  */
>>> +  memcpy (m_old_have_regs_of_mode, have_regs_of_mode, sizeof
>>> +       (have_regs_of_mode));
>>> +
>>> +  for (int i = 0; i < NUM_MACHINE_MODES; ++i)
>>> +    if (arm_need_mve_mode_regs (i)
>>> +     || arm_need_neon_mode_regs (i))
>>> +      have_regs_of_mode[i] = true;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +arm_target_switcher::~arm_target_switcher ()
>>> +{
>>> +  if (m_old_general_regs_only)
>>> +    global_options.x_target_flags |= MASK_GENERAL_REGS_ONLY;
>>> +  bitmap_copy (arm_active_target.isa, m_old_arm_active_target_isa);
>>> +  sbitmap_free (m_old_arm_active_target_isa);
>>> +  current_target_pragma = m_old_target_pragma;
>>> +
>>> +  memcpy (have_regs_of_mode, m_old_have_regs_of_mode,
>>> +       sizeof (have_regs_of_mode));
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  void
>>>  arm_init_builtins (void)
>>>  {
>>> @@ -1709,10 +1774,16 @@ arm_init_builtins (void)
>>>        = arm_general_add_builtin_function ("__builtin_arm_lane_check",
>>>                                         lane_check_fpr,
>>>                                         ARM_BUILTIN_SIMD_LANE_CHECK);
>>> -      if (TARGET_HAVE_MVE)
>>> -     arm_init_mve_builtins ();
>>> -      else
>>> -     arm_init_neon_builtins ();
>>> +
>>> +      /* Strong-typing hasn't been implemented for all AdvSIMD builtin
>>> +      intrinsics.  Therefore we need to preserve the old __builtin scalar
>>> +      types.  It can be removed once all the intrinsics become strongly
>>> +      typed using the qualifier system.  */
>>> +      arm_init_simd_builtin_scalar_types ();
>>> +      arm_init_simd_builtin_types ();
>>> +      arm_init_neon_builtins ();
>>> +      arm_init_mve_builtins ();
>>> +
>>>        arm_init_vfp_builtins ();
>>>        arm_init_crypto_builtins ();
>>>      }
>>

Reply via email to