On 1/21/26 3:58 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 01:27:44PM +0800, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/9/26 3:24 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2025 at 10:48:40PM +0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 11/15/25 8:36 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
+static tree
+get_info (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree call, int n, bool *non_constant_p,
+         bool *overflow_p, tree *jump_target)
+{
+  gcc_checking_assert (call_expr_nargs (call) > n);
+  tree info = get_nth_callarg (call, n);
+  gcc_checking_assert (REFLECTION_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (info)));
+  info = cxx_eval_constant_expression (ctx, info, vc_prvalue,
+                                      non_constant_p, overflow_p,
+                                      jump_target);
+  if (*jump_target)
+    return NULL_TREE;
+  if (!REFLECT_EXPR_P (info))
+    {
+      *non_constant_p = true;
+      return NULL_TREE;
+    }
+  return info;
+}
+
+/* Try to get the underlying FUNCTION_DECL from reflection if any,
+   otherwise return R.  */

Please say more about why get_first_fn isn't suitable (if it isn't).

The problem is that get_fns asserts that there was an overload set,
but often there won't be.  What I could do is to introduce
maybe_get_first_fn that uses maybe_get_fns.

Sounds good.

Posted a patch for this:
<https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2026-January/706367.html>
+static tree
+eval_is_override (tree r)
+{
+  r = maybe_get_reflection_fndecl (r);
+  if (TREE_CODE (r) == FUNCTION_DECL
+      && DECL_CLASS_SCOPE_P (r)
+      && !DECL_CONSTRUCTOR_P (r)
+      && (IDENTIFIER_VIRTUAL_P (DECL_NAME (r))
+         || DECL_CONV_FN_P (r))
+      && !DECL_STATIC_FUNCTION_P (r)

I'd think checking DECL_VIRTUAL_P could replace most of the above
conditions.

Changed to use DECL_VIRTUAL_P in
<https://forge.sourceware.org/marek/gcc/commit/9a040fb9c52c963ac5cf5ecffa4f4a0769446b24>

Do we still need to check DECL_CONV_FN_P?

No, removed in
<https://forge.sourceware.org/marek/gcc/commit/7982d483b57952ca9005c0b131fbccb432ed2d80>

+/* Process std::meta::is_user_provided.
+   Returns: true if r represents a function that is user-provided.
+   Otherwise, false.  */
+
+static tree
+eval_is_user_provided (tree r)
+{
+  r = maybe_get_reflection_fndecl (r);
+  if (TREE_CODE (r) == FUNCTION_DECL
+      && user_provided_p (r)
+      // TODO: user_provided_p is false for non-members defaulted on
+      // first declaration.

Maybe we could set DECL_INITIALIZED_IN_CLASS_P for non-member functions, too
(and probably rename it).

I suppose, but I'd rather not do it as part of the Reflection patch.

Fair...

+      && (!DECL_NAMESPACE_SCOPE_P (r) || !DECL_DELETED_FN (r)))

...but then I'd rather not halfway work around the issue in the reflection
patch, either.

I'm a little worried about changing DECL_INITIALIZED_IN_CLASS_P in
stage 4.  What if I opened an internal-improvement PR for this?

Actually I think we don't need to mess with DECL_INITIALIZED_IN_CLASS_P, because any function deleted after its first declaration is ill-formed rather than user-provided.

void f();
void f() = delete; // error, not first declaration

so we can just fix user_provided_p.

+  if (TREE_CODE (r) == CONST_DECL)
+    return boolean_true_node;
+  else
+    return boolean_false_node;
+}
+
+/* Process std::meta::has_internal_linkage.
+   Returns: true if r represents a variable, function, type, template, or
+   namespace whose name has internal linkage.  Otherwise, false.  */
+
+static tree
+eval_has_internal_linkage (tree r, reflect_kind kind)
+{
+  if (eval_is_variable (r, kind) == boolean_false_node
+      && eval_is_function (r) == boolean_false_node
+      && eval_is_type (r) == boolean_false_node
+      && eval_is_template (r) == boolean_false_node
+      && eval_is_namespace (r) == boolean_false_node)
+    return boolean_false_node;
+  r = maybe_get_reflection_fndecl (r);
+  r = STRIP_TEMPLATE (r);
+  if (TYPE_P (r))
+    {
+      if (TYPE_NAME (r) == NULL_TREE
+         || !DECL_P (TYPE_NAME (r))
+         || (!DECL_IMPLICIT_TYPEDEF_P (TYPE_NAME (r))
+             && TYPE_NAME (r) == TYPE_NAME (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (r))
+             && !TYPE_MAIN_DECL (r)))

It seems simpler to go directly to TYPE_NAME (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (r)) to find
the name with linkage, and probably also check OVERLOAD_TYPE_P.

I didn't understand this.

I was thinking type_linkage_name would be

if (!OVERLOAD_TYPE_P (t))
   return NULL_TREE;
return TYPE_NAME (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (t));

That breaks:

   struct cls { };
   using alias = cls;
   template<typename> struct cls_tmpl {};
   template<typename T> using cls_tmpl_alias = cls_tmpl<T>;

   static_assert (!has_linkage (^^alias));
   static_assert (!has_linkage (^^cls_tmpl_alias<int>));

Currently, for a RECORD_TYPE alias we return a TYPE_DECL alias,
but with this patch we return a TYPE_DECL cls (and same for the
alias template case).

Ah, so type_linkage_name isn't a great name, since what it does is specific to reflection alias handling. What it does is filter out types with no name, a non-DECL name (which is probably unnecessary, such types shouldn't be exposed to user code), and typedefs for linkage purposes.

It seems clearer to return null for all typedef_variant_p rather than just for typedefs for linkage purposes.

So,

if (OVERLOAD_TYPE_P (t)
    && !typedef_variant_p (t))
  return TYPE_NAME (t);
return NULL_TREE;

Jason

Reply via email to