Perverse combinations of options can lead to the compiler having to
work around unexpected situations.  Armv8 originally specified that
complex IT sequences were deprecated for performance (it was later
rescinded).  If the options restrict the floating-point unit to
one without vsel, then movMcc patterns need complex IT sequences
and we can end up with unmatched RTL patterns.  Avoid this by
failing early when the target patterns are disabled.

gcc/ChangeLog:

        PR target/124134
        * config/arm/arm.md (movsfcc): FAIL if using restricted IT
        blocks and we lack VSEL.
        (movdfcc): Likewise.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR target/124134
        * gcc.target/arm/pr124134.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/arm/arm.md                   | 12 ++++++++++--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr124134.c | 10 ++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr124134.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
index 4c3f1a5e2af..a3e6a362fde 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.md
@@ -8374,9 +8374,13 @@ (define_expand "movsfcc"
     enum rtx_code code = GET_CODE (operands[1]);
     rtx ccreg;
 
+    /* Perverse combinations of architecture options can't be supported
+       as they need conditional instructions.  */
+    if (TARGET_THUMB2 && arm_restrict_it && !TARGET_VFP5)
+      FAIL;
     if (!arm_validize_comparison (&operands[1], &XEXP (operands[1], 0),
                                          &XEXP (operands[1], 1)))
-       FAIL;
+      FAIL;
 
     code = GET_CODE (operands[1]);
     ccreg = arm_gen_compare_reg (code, XEXP (operands[1], 0),
@@ -8396,9 +8400,13 @@ (define_expand "movdfcc"
     enum rtx_code code = GET_CODE (operands[1]);
     rtx ccreg;
 
+    /* Perverse combinations of architecture options can't be supported
+       as they need conditional instructions.  */
+    if (TARGET_THUMB2 && arm_restrict_it && !TARGET_VFP5)
+      FAIL;
     if (!arm_validize_comparison (&operands[1], &XEXP (operands[1], 0), 
                                          &XEXP (operands[1], 1)))
-       FAIL;
+      FAIL;
     code = GET_CODE (operands[1]);
     ccreg = arm_gen_compare_reg (code, XEXP (operands[1], 0),
                                 XEXP (operands[1], 1), NULL_RTX);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr124134.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr124134.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9d80f95aff9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr124134.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_arch_v7a_fp_hard_ok } */
+/* { dg-add-options arm_arch_v7a_fp_hard } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-O2 -mrestrict-it" } */
+double max___a, max___b;
+double max() {
+  if (max___a < max___b)
+    return max___b;
+  return max___a;
+}
-- 
2.43.0

Reply via email to