Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
PR libstdc++/121402
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/ranges (repeat_view::_M_value): Add
[[no_unique_address]].
* testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc
[__cpp_lib_ranges_repeat]: New test.
---
libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges | 2 +-
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
index 8365bed17a6e..2cc17eb0f074 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/ranges
@@ -7874,7 +7874,7 @@ namespace views::__adaptor
&& (__detail::__is_integer_like<_Bound> || same_as<_Bound,
unreachable_sentinel_t>)
class repeat_view : public view_interface<repeat_view<_Tp, _Bound>>
{
- __detail::__box<_Tp> _M_value;
+ [[no_unique_address]] __detail::__box<_Tp> _M_value;
[[no_unique_address]] _Bound _M_bound = _Bound();
class _Iterator;
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc
b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc
index 0a84b0f1dcbe..45f53c783ec1 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/std/ranges/adaptors/sizeof.cc
@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
namespace ranges = std::ranges;
+struct Empty { };
+
auto pred_f(int x) { return x%2 == 0; };
auto pred_l = [] (int x) { return x%2 == 0; };
@@ -53,3 +55,7 @@ static_assert
#if __cpp_lib_ranges_slide
static_assert(sizeof(ranges::slide_view<V>) == 3*ptr);
#endif
+
+#if __cpp_lib_ranges_repeat
+static_assert(sizeof(ranges::repeat_view<Empty, size_t>) == 1*ptr);
+#endif
--
2.53.0.144.g73fd77805f