This is a summary of discussions relative to the merge request created by 
Antoni Boucher (antoyo) titled
libgccjit: Handle missing types in jit_langhook_type_for_mode
since its creation.

Description: ```
gcc/jit/ChangeLog:

        * dummy-frontend.cc: Handle new types in jit_langhook_type_for_mode.
```

On some targets (I found this was the case for Aarch64, probably), we need to 
handle some float types in jit_langhook_type_for_mode.

CC: David Malcolm <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>

The full and up to date discussion can be found at 
https://forge.sourceware.org/gcc/gcc-TEST/pulls/87

The merge request has been closed without being merged directly on the forge 
repository.


On 2025-09-29 18:29:50+00:00, Antoni Boucher (antoyo) wrote:

I'm not sure how I could test this since this is not needed on x86-64. Any 
ideas?


On 2025-09-29 18:57:17+00:00, Antoni Boucher (antoyo) wrote:

@rdfm: It seems the bot will send the email for the patch with the send date 
being the date on the patch.
Is this expected? This could make the email harder to find in mail clients that 
sort by date.


On 2025-10-01 15:37:18+00:00, Claudio Bantaloukas (rdfm) wrote:

@antoyo indeed, the code in batrachomyomachia will [run git 
format-patch](https://forge.sourceware.org/forge/batrachomyomachia/src/commit/f5fac826475293deabceb5f4d0b7b1eba88530cb/batrachomyomachia/local_git_ops.py#L549)
 and then [send the generated 
emails](https://forge.sourceware.org/forge/batrachomyomachia/src/commit/f5fac826475293deabceb5f4d0b7b1eba88530cb/batrachomyomachia/email.py#L81)
 without further changes to the Date.

My perl is rusty but I think what happens with git send-email is [that patch 
emails lose the date generated by git 
format-patch](https://github.com/git/git/blob/821f583da6d30a84249f75f33501504d597bc16b/git-send-email.perl#L1571).
I should add a ticket to sort this out.


On 2026-05-22 14:57:34+00:00, David Malcolm (dmalcolm) <[email protected]> 
approved the changes:
Thanks; LGTM



On 2026-06-17 14:11:58+00:00, Antoni Boucher (antoyo) wrote:

Thanks for the review.
Merged.

Reply via email to