On 2012.10.27 at 09:02 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> The problem here is that we end up with an INDIRECT_REF TREE_CODE with a
> null TREE_TYPE in lvalue_kind. Is this possible at that point, or does
> it point to a deeper underlying problem?
It looks like there is indeed a deeper problem. See PR53137, PR53697 and
PR54431 (which are all dups of one another).
For example:
template<class>struct A
{
void blah();
void bar()
{
[this] { blah(); } (); // crash without this->blah()
}
};
int main()
{
A<int> a;
a.bar();
}
--
Markus
