On 2012-11-09 07:18, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I think it actually should be removed, given that e.g.
> int i, j;
> void
> foo (void)
> {
> __atomic_store (&i, &j, 12);
> }
> warns twice for the same thing, when it should only warn once.
> Richard?Makes sense. r~
