On Sun, 18 Nov 2012, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 18/11/2012 16:59, Hans-Peter Nilsson ha scritto: > > Nice, but I agree with the other poster that this'd IMHO be > > better as --enable-checking=asan (or actually, > > --enable-checking=all,asan). > > Yeah, that's a good thing to support too. However, you still need a > toplevel build configuration to enable asan post-stage1. Configuring > with --enable-checking=all,asan would require the bootstrap compiler to > support asan, too.
We seem to be able to add various flags to compilations *after* the first stage (that are not valid at the first stage, for the bootstrapping/host compiler) so I still don't get why this should be conceptually different. But whatever. brgds, H-P
