Questions: are -fsanitize=thread -fsanitize=address mutually exclusive here? If yes, that will be wrong.
How about -fsanitize=all option? As kcc mentioned, the -fno-.. form is not handled. David On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Wei Mi <w...@google.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This patch is to change -faddress-sanitizer to -fsanitize=address. Ok for > trunk? > > 2012-11-19 Wei Mi <w...@google.com> > > * cfgexpand.c (partition_stack_vars): Change flag_asan to > flag_sanitize. > (expand_stack_vars): Likewise. > (defer_stack_allocation): Likewise. > (expand_used_vars): Likewise. > * varasm.c (assemble_noswitch_variable): Likewise. > (assemble_variable): Likewise. > (place_block_symbol): Likewise. > * asan.c (gate_asan): Likewise. > (gate_asan_O0): Likewise. > * toplev.c (compile_file): Likewise. > (process_options): Likewise. > * common.opt: Change faddress-sanitizer to fsanitize=address. > * gcc.c (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC): Likewise. > * testsuite/lib/asan-dg.exp > (check_effective_target_faddress_sanitizer): Likewise. > (asan_init): Likewise. > * flag-types.h (sanitize_type): New enum type. > * doc/invoke.texi (-fsanitize=[address|thread]): Document. > > Thanks, > Wei.
