Am 07.12.2012 10:17, schrieb Jakub Jelinek: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:13:11AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Am 07.12.2012 06:05, schrieb Jason Merrill: >>> It's perfectly OK to initialize a base class of abstract type; it's only an >>> error to create a full object of such a type. So this patch moves the check >>> from more generic initialization code out into a function that's definitely >>> creating a new object. >>> >>> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 4.7. >> >> this doesn't build on the branch: >> >> ../gcc/cp/tree.c: In function 'build_aggr_init_expr': >> ../gcc/cp/tree.c:399:1: error: parameter name omitted >> >> this fixes the bootstrap, currently running the testsuite. > > Please commit as obvious with appropriate ChangeLog entry. > >> --- cp/tree.c~ 2012-12-07 10:01:16.665415647 +0100 >> +++ cp/tree.c 2012-12-07 10:11:01.373410862 +0100 >> @@ -396,7 +396,8 @@ >> callable. */ >> >> tree >> -build_aggr_init_expr (tree type, tree init, tsubst_flags_t /*complain*/) >> +build_aggr_init_expr (tree type, tree init, >> + tsubst_flags_t complain ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) >> { >> tree fn; >> tree slot; > > Jakub >
comitted. Matthias 2012-12-07 Matthias Klose <d...@ubuntu.com> * tree.c (build_aggr_init_expr): Add parameter name, mark as unused.