On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I've run a script to notice gcc maintained files with FSF copyright that > have been modified in 2011 and/or 2012 (according to svn log, ignoring > r168438 and r184997 commits), but didn't have years 2011 and/or 2012 > included in Copyright lines. I've kept the preexisting style, so > where year ranges were used, updated those if needed, if not, kept the > year lists.
Can't we just move to ranges of years now that the FSF approves of them. They even approve of ranges where a file was not touched during that year. This seems better than listing all the years out. Thanks, Andrew
