On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 05:52:23PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> TBH, I'm not that familiar with the RTL infrastructure enough to
> answer these questions. While I can spend some time on this problem,
> and probably waste quite some reviewer's time, the problem is not that
> trivial as I hoped to be, so I would kindly ask someone with better
> understanding of this part of the compiler for the proper solution.

After discussion with rth on IRC, this modified patch just uses
volatile_insn_p, making all UNSPEC_VOLATILE (wherever in insn) and asm
volatile into a complete scheduling barrier for optimizations that use this
function.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2012-01-08  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
            Uros Bizjak  <ubiz...@gmail.com>

        PR rtl-optimization/55845
        * df-problems.c (can_move_insns_across): Stop scanning at
        volatile_insn_p source instruction or give up if
        across_from .. across_to range contains any volatile_insn_p
        instructions.

2012-01-08  Uros Bizjak  <ubiz...@gmail.com>
            Vladimir Yakovlev  <vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com>

        PR rtl-optimization/55845
        * gcc.target/i386/pr55845.c: New test.

--- gcc/df-problems.c.jj        2012-11-19 14:41:26.181898964 +0100
+++ gcc/df-problems.c   2013-01-07 18:38:33.064974313 +0100
@@ -3858,6 +3858,8 @@ can_move_insns_across (rtx from, rtx to,
        }
       if (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
        {
+         if (volatile_insn_p (PATTERN (insn)))
+           return false;
          memrefs_in_across |= for_each_rtx (&PATTERN (insn), find_memory,
                                             NULL);
          note_stores (PATTERN (insn), find_memory_stores,
@@ -3917,7 +3919,9 @@ can_move_insns_across (rtx from, rtx to,
       if (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
        {
          if (may_trap_or_fault_p (PATTERN (insn))
-             && (trapping_insns_in_across || other_branch_live != NULL))
+             && (trapping_insns_in_across
+                 || other_branch_live != NULL
+                 || volatile_insn_p (PATTERN (insn))))
            break;
 
          /* We cannot move memory stores past each other, or move memory
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55845.c.jj  2013-01-07 18:30:19.168801389 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr55845.c     2013-01-07 18:30:19.168801389 
+0100
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target avx } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -ffast-math -fschedule-insns -mavx -mvzeroupper" } */
+
+#include "avx-check.h"
+
+#define N 100
+
+double
+__attribute__((noinline))
+foo (int size, double y[], double x[])
+{
+  double sum = 0.0;
+  int i;
+  for (i = 0, sum = 0.; i < size; i++)
+    sum += y[i] * x[i];
+  return (sum);
+}
+
+static void
+__attribute__ ((noinline))
+avx_test ()
+{
+  double x[N];
+  double y[N];
+  double s;
+  int i;
+
+  for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
+    {
+      x[i] = i;
+      y[i] = i;
+    }
+
+  s = foo (N, y, x);
+
+  if (s != 328350.0)
+    abort ();
+}


        Jakub

Reply via email to