On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev <vbyakov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I sent the patch. Send it once more.
>
> 2013/1/11 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>:
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 03:25:47PM +0400, Vladimir Yakovlev wrote:
>>> I've fixed Changelog. Can we commit the patch to trunk now?
>>>
>>> 2012-12-27  Vladimir Yakovlev  <vladimir.b.yakov...@intel.com>
>>>
>>>       * config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros_internal): New case.
>>>       (ix86_target_macros_internal): Likewise.
>>>
>>>       * config/i386/i386.c (m_CORE2I7): Removed.
>>>       (m_CORE_HASWELL): New macro.
>>>       (m_CORE_ALL): Likewise.
>>>       (initial_ix86_tune_features): m_CORE2I7 is replaced by m_CORE_ALL.
>>>       (initial_ix86_arch_features): Likewise.
>>>       (processor_target_table): Initializations for Core avx2.
>>>       (cpu_names): New names "core-avx2".
>>>       (ix86_option_override_internal): Changed PROCESSOR_COREI7 by
>>>       PROCESSOR_CORE_HASWELL.
>>>       (ix86_issue_rate): New case.
>>>       (ia32_multipass_dfa_lookahead): Likewise.
>>>       (ix86_sched_init_global): Likewise.
>>>
>>>       * config/i386/i386.h (TARGET_HASWELL): New macro.
>>>       (target_cpu_default): New TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT_haswell.
>>>       (processor_type): New PROCESSOR_HASWELL.
>>
>> Uros already acked the patch, so it certainly is ok to commit now.

Yes, the patch is OK, you can commit it to mainline SVN. If you are
unable to commit, please say so in the patch proposal, so someone will
commit the patch for you (as explained in [1]).

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html

Uros.

Reply via email to