Le 01/01/2013 21:18, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
Hello world,

the attached patch replaces ANY(a, b, c) with a .or. b .or c,
leading to reduced execution time. It also handles ALL, PRODUCT
and SUM.

This fixes a bug noted by Michael Metcalf.

Regression-tested. OK for trunk?

A few comments below.

Mikael

Index: frontend-passes.c
===================================================================
--- frontend-passes.c   (Revision 194760)
+++ frontend-passes.c   (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -180,7 +183,172 @@ optimize_expr (gfc_expr **e, int *walk_subtrees AT
   return 0;
 }

+/* Auxiliary function to handle the arguments to reduction intrnisics.
+   If the function is a scalar, just copy it; otherwise Returns the new
+   element, the old one can be freed.  */

+static gfc_expr *
+copy_walk_reduction_arg (gfc_expr *e, gfc_expr *fn)
+{
+  gfc_expr *fcn;
+  const char *new_name;
+  gfc_actual_arglist *actual_arglist;
+
+  if (e->rank == 0 || e->expr_type == EXPR_FUNCTION)
+    fcn = gfc_copy_expr (e);
+  else
+    {
+      fcn = gfc_get_expr ();
+      fcn->expr_type = EXPR_FUNCTION;
+      fcn->value.function.isym = fn->value.function.isym;
+      actual_arglist = gfc_get_actual_arglist ();
+      actual_arglist->expr = gfc_copy_expr (e);
+      actual_arglist->next = gfc_get_actual_arglist ();
Another one is needed.  I get a segmentation fault with SUM.

[...]
+
+/* Callback function for optimzation of reductions to scalars.  Transform
+   ANY ([f1,f2,f3, ...]) to f1 .or. f2 .or. f3 .or. ..., with ANY,
+   SUM and PRODUCT correspondingly.  Handly only the simple cases without
+   MASK and DIM.  */
+
+static int
+callback_reduction (gfc_expr **e, int *walk_subtrees ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
+                   void *data ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+{
+  gfc_expr *fn, *arg;
+  gfc_intrinsic_op op;
+  gfc_isym_id id;
+  gfc_actual_arglist *a;
+  gfc_actual_arglist *dim;
+  gfc_constructor *c;
+  gfc_expr *res, *new_expr;
+
+  fn = *e;
+
+  if (fn->rank != 0 || fn->expr_type != EXPR_FUNCTION
+      || fn->value.function.isym == NULL)
+    return 0;
+
+  id = fn->value.function.isym->id;
+
+  if (id != GFC_ISYM_SUM && id != GFC_ISYM_PRODUCT
+      && id != GFC_ISYM_ANY && id != GFC_ISYM_ALL)
+    return 0;
+
+  a = fn->value.function.actual;
+
+  /* Don't handle MASK or DIM.  */
+
+  dim = a->next;
+
+  if (dim != NULL)
+    {
Minor, but I think you can assume dim != NULL.  Same for mask.

+      gfc_actual_arglist *mask;
+
+      if (dim->expr != NULL)
+       return 0;
+
+      mask = dim->next;
+      if (mask != NULL)
+       if ( mask->expr != NULL)
+         return 0;
+    }
+
+  arg = a->expr;
+
+  if (arg->expr_type != EXPR_ARRAY)
+    return 0;
+
+  switch (id)
+    {
+    case GFC_ISYM_SUM:
+      op = INTRINSIC_PLUS;
+      break;
+
+    case GFC_ISYM_PRODUCT:
+      op = INTRINSIC_TIMES;
+      break;
+
+    case GFC_ISYM_ANY:
+      op = INTRINSIC_OR;
+      break;
+
+    case GFC_ISYM_ALL:
+      op = INTRINSIC_AND;
+      break;
+
+    default:
+      return 0;
+    }
+
+  c = gfc_constructor_first (arg->value.constructor);
+
+  if (c == NULL)
+    return 0;
+
+  res = copy_walk_reduction_arg (c->expr, fn);
+
+  c = gfc_constructor_next (c);
+  while (c)
+    {
+      new_expr = gfc_get_expr ();
+      new_expr->ts = fn->ts;
+      new_expr->expr_type = EXPR_OP;
+      new_expr->rank = fn->rank;
+      new_expr->where = fn->where;
+      new_expr->value.op.op = op;
+      new_expr->value.op.op1 = res;
+      new_expr->value.op.op2 = copy_walk_reduction_arg (c->expr, fn);
+      res = new_expr;
+      c = gfc_constructor_next (c);
+    }
+
+  gfc_simplify_expr (res, 0);
+  *e = res;
+  gfc_free_expr (fn);
+
+  /* We changed things from under the expression walker.  Walking the
+     old tree would mess up things, so let's not do that.  */
+  return 1;
I think this prevents any further reduction optimization. The following variant of your test case doesn't avoid the temporary:

    do i=1,3
       if (any([abs(a(i,1) - b(i,1)) > acc,  &
            (j==i+1,j=3,8)])) cycle
       if (any([abs(a(i,2) - b(i,2)) > acc, &
            abs(a(i,3) - b(i,3)) > acc, lo(i,:)])) cycle
       c = c + i
    end do

Reply via email to