Ping? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01197.html
On 16 January 2013 14:46, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: > Ping^2 ? > > > On 8 January 2013 17:24, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> wrote: >> Ping? >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01197.html >> >> Thanks, >> >> Christophe >> >> On 19 December 2012 16:59, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> >> wrote: >>> On 17 December 2012 16:12, Richard Earnshaw <rearn...@arm.com> wrote: >>>> On 29/11/12 17:16, Christophe Lyon wrote: >>>>> On trunk I have noticed a regression in gfortran when using modulo >>>>> scheduling: sms-1.f90 now fails, but I suspect it's not because of >>>>> this patch since forcing compilation for armv5t makes the same test >>>>> fail with and without my patch. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hmm, that's worrying. Could you please makesure this is recorded in >>>> bugzilla. If this is a regression, please mark it as such. >>>> >>> I was about to do so, but after bisecting it turns out that the >>> problem was introduced by >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192969 and is very >>> likely to be another instance of PR55562, which has just been fixed >>> by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01137.html. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Now that this optimization is disabled by default, the onlya8 code is >>>> completely redundant and should be purged, along with the insn alternatives >>>> that used it. >>>> >>>> R. >>>> >>> Here is a new version of my patch, with the cleanup you requested. >>> >>> 2012-12-18 Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> >>> >>> gcc/ >>> * config/arm/arm-protos.h (tune_params): Add >>> prefer_neon_for_64bits field. >>> * config/arm/arm.c (prefer_neon_for_64bits): New variable. >>> (arm_slowmul_tune): Default prefer_neon_for_64bits to false. >>> (arm_fastmul_tune, arm_strongarm_tune, arm_xscale_tune): Ditto. >>> (arm_9e_tune, arm_v6t2_tune, arm_cortex_tune): Ditto. >>> (arm_cortex_a5_tune, arm_cortex_a15_tune): Ditto. >>> (arm_cortex_a9_tune, arm_fa726te_tune): Ditto. >>> (arm_option_override): Handle -mneon-for-64bits new option. >>> * config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_PREFER_NEON_64BITS): New macro. >>> (prefer_neon_for_64bits): Declare new variable. >>> * config/arm/arm.md (arch): Rename neon_onlya8 and neon_nota8 to >>> avoid_neon_for_64bits and neon_for_64bits. Remove onlya8 and >>> nota8. >>> (arch_enabled): Handle new arch types. Remove support for onlya8 >>> and nota8. >>> (one_cmpldi2): Use new arch names. >>> * config/arm/arm.opt (mneon-for-64bits): Add option. >>> * config/arm/neon.md (adddi3_neon, subdi3_neon, iordi3_neon) >>> (anddi3_neon, xordi3_neon, ashldi3_neon, <shift>di3_neon): Use >>> neon_for_64bits instead of nota8 and avoid_neon_for_64bits instead >>> of onlya8. >>> * doc/invoke.texi (-mneon-for-64bits): Document. >>> >>> gcc/testsuite/ >>> * gcc.target/arm/neon-for-64bits-1.c: New tests. >>> * gcc.target/arm/neon-for-64bits-2.c: Likewise.