On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Mike Stump <m...@mrs.kithrup.com> wrote: > On Feb 4, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Jack Howarth <howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: >> Currently darwin is unable to utilize libasan with constructors due to the >> lack of >> constructor priority support on that target. > >> Okay for gcc trunk? > > Since asan doesn't need cross translation unit priorities, the patch is > sufficient to fix all of the semantics needed for asan. > > I still have a preference, though small, for stable_sort instead of qsort, > absent performance data saying qsort is better. > > Ok.
Oh, if you could, could you qsort of the dtors as well. The code exactly mirrors the ctors code.
