After fixing PR54009 (again), I thought I'd take a look at why reload
is generating the following correct but poor code
stw 10,8(1)
stw 11 12(1)
...
lfd 0,8(1)
stfd 0,x+32764@l(9)
rather than
addi 9,x+32764@l(9)
...
stw 10,0(9)
stw 11 4(9)
This code sequence is from
(set (mem/c:DF (lo_sum:SI (reg/f:SI 9)
(const:SI (plus:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("x"))
(const_int 32764)))))
(reg:DF 10) ...gcc.target/powerpc/pr54009.c:42 363 {*movdf_hardfloat32})
In tracing through reload, I see a score of 8 for the m<-d
alternative, and 9 for Y<-r. In both cases we have one "loser"
operand for a score of 6 ("d" in the first case, "Y" in the second),
plus a score of 2 from
/* We prefer to reload pseudos over reloading other things,
since such reloads may be able to be eliminated later.
If we are reloading a SCRATCH, we won't be generating any
insns, just using a register, so it is also preferred.
So bump REJECT in other cases. Don't do this in the
case where we are forcing a constant into memory and
it will then win since we don't want to have a different
alternative match then. */
if (! (REG_P (operand)
&& REGNO (operand) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
&& GET_CODE (operand) != SCRATCH
&& ! (const_to_mem && constmemok))
reject += 2;
The Y<-r alternative gets one extra from
/* Input reloads can be inherited more often than output
reloads can be removed, so penalize output reloads. */
if (operand_type[i] != RELOAD_FOR_INPUT
&& GET_CODE (operand) != SCRATCH)
reject++;
The problem of course is that the input reload is quite expensive,
involving a copy to memory. So, how about teaching reload about this
as follows? I picked 6 for the reject value to make it equivalent to
a '?' in the constraint, but that may be too large. Any value of 2 or
greater works for the testcase.
Bootstrapped and regression tested powerpc64-linux, but not yet spec
tested.
2013-02-07 Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com>
* reload.c (find_reloads): Disparage reg alternatives needing
secondary memory to reload.
Index: gcc/reload.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/reload.c (revision 195707)
+++ gcc/reload.c (working copy)
@@ -3633,11 +3633,21 @@
== NO_REGS)
reject = 600;
- if (operand_type[i] == RELOAD_FOR_OUTPUT
- && (targetm.preferred_output_reload_class (operand,
- this_alternative[i])
- == NO_REGS))
+ else if (operand_type[i] == RELOAD_FOR_OUTPUT
+ && (targetm.preferred_output_reload_class
+ (operand, this_alternative[i])
+ == NO_REGS))
reject = 600;
+
+#ifdef SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED
+ else if (REG_P (operand)
+ && REGNO (operand) < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER
+ && (SECONDARY_MEMORY_NEEDED
+ ((enum reg_class) this_alternative[i],
+ REGNO_REG_CLASS (REGNO (operand)),
+ operand_mode[i])))
+ reject += 6;
+#endif
}
/* We prefer to reload pseudos over reloading other things,
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
