Ok for the google branch -- please provide the patch details in svn commit message (note that ChangeLog is not needed any more for the branch).
David On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Matt Hargett <m...@use.net> wrote: > On Feb 14, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Xinliang David Li <davi...@google.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Matt <m...@use.net> wrote: >>> The attached patches do two things: >>> 1. Backports a fix from trunk that eliminates bogus warning traces. On my >>> current codebase which links ~40MB of C++ with LTO, the bogus warning traces >>> are literally hundreds of lines. >> >> What is the trunk revision? > > Richard's original patch was committed to trunk in r195884. > > >>> I verified the backport fixed our issue by doing doing a profiledbootstrap >>> using the bootstrap-lto.mk config with -O3 added. I used the resulting >>> compiler on the proprietary codebase, C++Benchmark, scummvm, and a few other >>> open source projects to validate. >>> >>> 2. Our primary development platform is RHEL6.1-based, and the recent >>> autoconf requirement bump locked us out. I lowered the version, and saw no >>> difference in ability to configure/bootstrap. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> -- >>> tangled strands of DNA explain the way that I behave. >>> http://www.clock.org/~matt