Hi! This function was releasing only some vectors pushed into queues vector, not all, and wasn't releasing bounds vector. Fixed thusly. There is no need to use a typedef for the C++ish vec.h vectors, and the code can be tiny bit simplified.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? 2013-03-04 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR middle-end/56461 * tree-ssa-loop-niter.c (bb_queue): Remove typedef. (discover_iteration_bound_by_body_walk): Change queues to vec<vec<basic_block> > and queue to vec<basic_block>. Fix up spelling in comment. Call safe_push on queues[bound_index] directly. Release queues[queue_index] in every iteration unconditionally. Release bounds vector. --- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c.jj 2013-02-27 23:05:07.000000000 +0100 +++ gcc/tree-ssa-loop-niter.c 2013-03-04 14:57:37.380872029 +0100 @@ -3007,9 +3007,6 @@ bound_index (vec<double_int> bounds, dou gcc_unreachable (); } -/* Used to hold vector of queues of basic blocks bellow. */ -typedef vec<basic_block> bb_queue; - /* We recorded loop bounds only for statements dominating loop latch (and thus executed each loop iteration). If there are any bounds on statements not dominating the loop latch we can improve the estimate by walking the loop @@ -3022,8 +3019,8 @@ discover_iteration_bound_by_body_walk (s pointer_map_t *bb_bounds; struct nb_iter_bound *elt; vec<double_int> bounds = vNULL; - vec<bb_queue> queues = vNULL; - bb_queue queue = bb_queue(); + vec<vec<basic_block> > queues = vNULL; + vec<basic_block> queue = vNULL; ptrdiff_t queue_index; ptrdiff_t latch_index = 0; pointer_map_t *block_priority; @@ -3096,7 +3093,7 @@ discover_iteration_bound_by_body_walk (s present in the path and we look for path with largest smallest bound on it. - To avoid the need for fibonaci heap on double ints we simply compress + To avoid the need for fibonacci heap on double ints we simply compress double ints into indexes to BOUNDS array and then represent the queue as arrays of queues for every index. Index of BOUNDS.length() means that the execution of given BB has @@ -3162,16 +3159,11 @@ discover_iteration_bound_by_body_walk (s } if (insert) - { - bb_queue queue2 = queues[bound_index]; - queue2.safe_push (e->dest); - queues[bound_index] = queue2; - } + queues[bound_index].safe_push (e->dest); } } } - else - queues[queue_index].release (); + queues[queue_index].release (); } gcc_assert (latch_index >= 0); @@ -3187,6 +3179,7 @@ discover_iteration_bound_by_body_walk (s } queues.release (); + bounds.release (); pointer_map_destroy (bb_bounds); pointer_map_destroy (block_priority); } Jakub