Hi, On Thu, 14 Mar 2013, Richard Biener wrote:
> That said - can we please pass in the type of the operation (and thus > the newly created result temporary) _explicitely_ please? Thus I'm mostly with you (not adding gimple_builder_ssa, but improving the existing interface), except for this one. Most of the unary and binary arithmetic and logical operations will have the the type of the first argument as result type. Spelling that out adds useless noise, so it shuoldn't be required. We'd need some good way to specify a type for the rest that makes sure that you can't use the easy way with those tree codes. Ciao, Michael.
