On 03/14/2013 05:34 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 13/02/13 23:35, Vladimir Makarov wrote:

Sorry for the delay with the answer.  I was and am quite busy with other
more urgent things.  I'll work on it when I have more free time.  In any
case, I'll do it before stage1 to have your patch ready.
Vladimir,

do you have an ETA on this review?


Actually, I am done with it. In general, it is ok. Although I have some minors comments:

In Changelog, you missed '*" before cgraph.h:

    * haifa-sched.c (recompute_todo_spec, check_clobbered_conditions): Add
    new argument to find_all_hard_reg_sets call.
    cgraph.h (struct cgraph_node): Add function_used_regs,
    function_used_regs_initialized and function_used_regs_valid fields.


@@ -3391,6 +3394,7 @@ df_get_call_refs (struct df_collection_r
         }
     }
       else if (TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (regs_invalidated_by_call, i)

I'd remove the test of regs_invalidated_by_call.

+           && TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (fn_reg_set_usage, i)
            /* no clobbers for regs that are the result of the call */
            && !TEST_HARD_REG_BIT (defs_generated, i)

+static void
+collect_fn_hard_reg_usage (void)
+{
+  rtx insn;
+  int i;
+  struct cgraph_node *node;
+  struct hard_reg_set_container other_usage;
+
+  if (!flag_use_caller_save)
+    return;
+
+  node = cgraph_get_node (current_function_decl);
+  gcc_assert (node != NULL);
+
+  gcc_assert (!node->function_used_regs_initialized);
+  node->function_used_regs_initialized = 1;
+
+  for (insn = get_insns (); insn != NULL_RTX; insn = next_insn (insn))
+    {
+      HARD_REG_SET insn_used_regs;
+
+      if (!NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
+    continue;
+
+      find_all_hard_reg_sets (insn, &insn_used_regs, false);
+
+      if (CALL_P (insn)
+ && !get_call_reg_set_usage (insn, &insn_used_regs, call_used_reg_set))
+    {
+      CLEAR_HARD_REG_SET (node->function_used_regs);
+      return;
+    }
+

I'd put it before find_all_hard_reg_sets

+      IOR_HARD_REG_SET (node->function_used_regs, insn_used_regs);
+    }
+



But you can ignore my two last 2 comments.

The patch is ok for me for trunk at stage1. But I think you need a formal approval for df-scan.c, arm.c, mips.c, GCC testsuite expect files (lib/target-supports.exp and gcc.target/mips/mips.exp) as I am not a maintainer of these parts although these changes look ok for me.

Thanks for your hard work and sorry for the review delay.

I guess you need to pay attention to reported problems for some time after you commit the patch as it affects all targets.

Reply via email to