On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:51:30PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: >> On 03/14/2013 09:48 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote: >> >Is this OK to commit to 4.9 when stage 1 opens up? >> >> Yes, but please add the other new tree codes as well. > > I wonder if it wouldn't be better to fold the target builtins only later on > (e.g. guard the folding with cfun && gimple_in_ssa_p (cfun) (or if we have > any predicate that is set starting with gimplification or so)). > Having all the FEs have to deal with myriads of weird tree codes etc. isn't > IMHO desirable.
Agreed. -- Gaby
