Tobias Burnus wrote:
Can you put this behind an option so the user has to specify that he really means it?Regarding an option: Would be -f(no-)directives (with default = on) a suitable option, which also affects the other !GCC$ attributes, such as dllexport etc.?Namely, the attached patch?
I have now committed the original patch (Rev. 198011). The option thing can be done as follow up. Is my -f(no-)directives patch okay? Or do you envision something else?
Tobias
