On 04/24/2013 12:48 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
I would really rather avoid introducing another macro to be removed again
later. Instead, let's use a value of __cplusplus greater than 201103L,
perhaps 201300?
yes, that makes sense, and even a better path forward.
Hopefully, the next committee draft will have that value.
We won't have a value for the next standard until we have a next
standard, so let's just invent a value for now; presumably people will
know better than to check for that invented value specifically.
Jason
