On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:42:55PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:39:58PM +0400, Maksim Kuznetsov wrote: > > 2013/4/29 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>: > > > Also, why are you handling just %{ and %}, and > > > not also %| ? I mean, if you want to print say {|} into assembly for both > > > dialects, don't you need: > > > asm ("{dialect1%{%|%}|%{%|%}dialect2}"); > > > or similar? If you use just | instead of %|, it would be handled as > > > separator of the dialects. > > > > Sure. %| was removed due to concerns over some target architectures > > already use it, but now %| is under ASSEMBLER_DIALECT and doesn't seem > > to affect them. > > > > ChangeLog: > > > > 2013-04-29 Maxim Kuznetsov <maks.kuznet...@gmail.com> > > * final.c (do_assembler_dialects): Don't handle curly braces and > > vertical bar escaped by % as dialect delimiters. > > (output_asm_insn): Print curly braces and vertical bar if escaped > > by % and ASSEMBLER_DIALECT defined. > > * doc/tm.texi (ASSEMBLER_DIALECT): Document new standard escapes. > > > > testsuite/ChangeLog: > > > > 2013-04-29 Maxim Kuznetsov <maks.kuznet...@gmail.com> > > > > * gcc.target/i386/asm-dialect-2.c: New testcase. > > Ok, thanks.
I've noticed this hasn't been applied yet; if you don't have SVN access, you need to mention it explicitly, or is there other reason why it hasn't been committed? Jakub