Hi, The following patch fixes PR57385 (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57385)
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 51e7b9e..cca61e7 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2013-05-24 Alexander Ivchenko <alexander.ivche...@intel.com> + + PR tree-ssa/57385 + * tree-ssa-sccvn.c (fully_constant_vn_reference_p): Check + that index is not negative. + 2013-05-23 Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> PR target/56742 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index b1895fb..730e62f 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2013-05-24 Alexander Ivchenko <alexander.ivche...@intel.com> + + PR tree-ssa/57385 + * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr57385.c: New test. + 2013-05-23 Christian Bruel <christian.br...@st.com> PR debug/57351 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr57385.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr57385.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a04a998 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr57385.c @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O1" } */ + +int c; + +void foo(int f) +{ + int wbi=-1; + c = (f ? "012346000000000000":"01345:000000006008")[wbi]; +} diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c index 49d61b0..0e7a74c 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c @@ -1294,6 +1294,7 @@ fully_constant_vn_reference_p (vn_reference_t ref) == TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (arg0->op0)))) && GET_MODE_CLASS (TYPE_MODE (op->type)) == MODE_INT && GET_MODE_SIZE (TYPE_MODE (op->type)) == 1 + && tree_int_cst_sgn (op->op0) >= 0 && compare_tree_int (op->op0, TREE_STRING_LENGTH (arg0->op0)) < 0) return build_int_cst_type (op->type, (TREE_STRING_POINTER (arg0->op0) Tested and bootsraped on x86-64 linux. Is it ok for trunk? If yes, should we backport it to 4.8? thanks, Alexander