On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:56:31AM -0700, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote: > I'm tempted to check this patch into trunk. Jakub?
Looks good to me. Will you prepare corresponding patch for the 4.8 branch
too (I guess it should be pretty much the same, not sure if it should keep
using typedef system_clock steady_clock as before for the non-MONOTONIC
configuration, or if it should just do the same thing as trunk)?
Thanks.
Jakub
