auto profile info is not available yet in early inlining, why would
this change make any difference? Can you just reset the max_iters to a
higher value for autoFDO?

David

On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Dehao Chen <de...@google.com> wrote:
> The patch was committed to google-4_8, but it causes problem because
> einline sets PARAM_EARLY_INLINING_INSNS = 11. This will cause
> recursive inlining at einline stage (e.g. main->foo, foo->bar,
> bar->foo) when autofdo is enabled.
>
> The following patch can fix the problem by doing more targetted early 
> inlining:
>
> Index: gcc/predict.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/predict.c (revision 199593)
> +++ gcc/predict.c (working copy)
> @@ -175,6 +175,8 @@ cgraph_maybe_hot_edge_p (struct cgraph_edge *edge)
>        && !maybe_hot_count_p (NULL,
>                               edge->count))
>      return false;
> +  if (flag_auto_profile)
> +    return false;
>    if (edge->caller->frequency == NODE_FREQUENCY_UNLIKELY_EXECUTED
>        || (edge->callee
>    && edge->callee->frequency == NODE_FREQUENCY_UNLIKELY_EXECUTED))
>
> Performance testing on-going...
>
> Dehao
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Dehao Chen <de...@google.com> wrote:
>> OK, I'll commit the early inline part.
>>
>> Dehao
>>
>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Xinliang David Li <davi...@google.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> The early inlining part is ok. The tracer optimization should be
>>> revisited -- we should have more fine grain control on it (for
>>> instance, based on FDO summary -- but that should be common to
>>> FDO/LIPO).
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Dehao Chen <de...@google.com> wrote:
>>>> In gcc4-8, the max einline iterations are restricted to 1. For
>>>> AutoFDO, this is bad because early inline is not size restricted. This
>>>> patch allows einline to do multiple iterations in AutoFDO. It also
>>>> enables tracer optimization in AutoFDO.
>>>>
>>>> Bootstrapped and passed regression test.
>>>>
>>>> OK for googel-4_8?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Dehao
>>>>
>>>> Index: gcc/ipa-inline.c
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- gcc/ipa-inline.c (revision 199416)
>>>> +++ gcc/ipa-inline.c (working copy)
>>>> @@ -2161,7 +2161,8 @@ early_inliner (void)
>>>>      {
>>>>        /* We iterate incremental inlining to get trivial cases of indirect
>>>>   inlining.  */
>>>> -      while (iterations < PARAM_VALUE (PARAM_EARLY_INLINER_MAX_ITERATIONS)
>>>> +      while ((flag_auto_profile
>>>> +      || iterations < PARAM_VALUE (PARAM_EARLY_INLINER_MAX_ITERATIONS))
>>>>       && early_inline_small_functions (node))
>>>>   {
>>>>    timevar_push (TV_INTEGRATION);
>>>> Index: gcc/opts.c
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- gcc/opts.c (revision 199416)
>>>> +++ gcc/opts.c (working copy)
>>>> @@ -1644,6 +1644,8 @@ common_handle_option (struct gcc_options *opts,
>>>>   opts->x_flag_peel_loops = value;
>>>>        if (!opts_set->x_flag_value_profile_transformations)
>>>>   opts->x_flag_value_profile_transformations = value;
>>>> +      if (!opts_set->x_flag_tracer)
>>>> + opts->x_flag_tracer = value;
>>>>        if (!opts_set->x_flag_inline_functions)
>>>>   opts->x_flag_inline_functions = value;
>>>>        if (!opts_set->x_flag_ipa_cp)

Reply via email to