Hello, May I have a review from the DWARF, the ARM and RS6000 maintainers for comments/approval ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01613.html Needed to fix the powerpc-spe bootstrap referenced in bugzilla #57389 Many Thanks Christian Christian Bruel <christian.br...@st.com> wrote: >> However I feel a little bit uncomfortable with this solution that >> doesn't seem to fix the root cause. The dbx_register_number hooks is >> called basically from two places : dwarf2cfi.c and dwarf2out.c. That >> show different uses: either we want to refer to the hard regno when >> dealing with the cfa description (whereas we want DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM, >> not DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER). or we use the DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER for output >> register locations. >> >> Since this information cannot be detected contextually, I'd like to >> extend the dwarf_register_span target hook to return a dbx number or >> not. This is dwarf-span-target-dbx.patch >> >> build tested with the configurations that failed at one time or the other: >> - sh64-unknown-elf (The original sh64-elf build failure assertion in >> dwarf2cfi is fixed.) >> - arm-none-eabi -with-fpu=neon-vfpv4 >> - powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe >> - x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu sanity build OK >> >> Is dwarf-span-target-dbx.patch OK for trunk ?. More comments ?
