On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:44:12PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> There is another thing to solve BTW, op0 and/or op1 might have side-effects,
> if you are going to evaluate them more than once, they need to be surrounded
> into cp_save_expr resp. c_save_expr.
There's that unpleasant thing that cp_save_expr is declared in
cp/cp-tree.h, but we don't want to include cp/*.h or c/*.h files
in c-family/c-ubsan.c. Should I use save_expr from tree.c instead?
I seem to recall that that isn't the best thing to do...
Marek
