On 18/06/13 11:35, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote: >> Do you mean that your comment 6 in PR56809 is not a good solution >> since you are going to remove JUMP_TABLE_DAT from active_insn_p ?? >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56809 > > No, that one I'll fix, it's fall-out from the JUMP_TABLE_DATA change > and thus my responsibility to fix.
Btw. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57609 is also a fall-out from the JUMP_TABLE_DATA change. -Andreas-
