> Except that now FreeBSD 10.x is broken. :-( Death to the guy whose thought that adding/removing _t was a good idea...
> In file included from > /scratch2/tmp/gerald/gcc-HEAD/libgfortran/runtime/fpu.c:29:0: > ./fpu-target.h: In function 'get_fpu_except_flags': > ./fpu-target.h:88:3: error: unknown type name 'fp_except' > fp_except set_excepts; > ^ > gmake[3]: *** [fpu.lo] Error 1 > > Excerpt from the man page on such a system: > > fp_except_t > fpgetmask(void); > > fp_except_t > fpsetmask(fp_except_t mask); > > fp_except_t > fpgetsticky(void); > > fp_except_t > fpresetsticky(fp_except_t sticky); > > My autoconf foo does not seem to be strong enough for libgfortran, > but I assume checking for both types and then using #ifdef HAVE_FP_EXCEPT_T > ...#elif HAVE_FP_EXCEPT...#endif ought to work? Yes, I think that we just need to patch the LIBGFOR_CHECK_FPSETMASK check in acinclude.m4 so as to also test the return type of the function. -- Eric Botcazou
