On 06/27/2013 07:59 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
I assume I can't call directly c_build_vec_perm_expr on the original arguments without build_non_dependent_expr?
It looks like c_build_vec_perm_expr is safe to take the original arguments, since it doesn't look deep into the expression. So either way is fine.
By the way, should I rename cp_build_vec_perm_expr as build_x_vec_perm_expr, since most of its code is copied from build_x_binary_op and not cp_build_binary_op?
Makes sense. OK with that change. Jason
