Hi, On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Marc Glisse wrote:
> If you want to handle integers, shouldn't you test TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED > (for LONG_MIN)? Right, ... > FLOAT_TYPE_P does seem safer indeed. ... hence this is it now. > > I'd replace TREE_TYPE (expr) with itype on the next line, it is confusing to > refer to it under 2 different names on 2 consecutive lines. True, I made that change. r200926. Ciao, Michael.
