On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov <ma...@kugelworks.com> wrote: > While verifying license compliance for GCC and its libraries I noticed that > several libgcc files that end up in the final library are licensed under > GPL-3.0+ instead of GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception. > > This is, obviously, was not the intention of developers who just copied wrong > boilerplate text, and this patch fixes the oversights. > > Just to avoid any possible fallout from this issue ... > > Marcus, did you and ARM intend to license config/aarch64/sfp-machine.h and > config/aarch64/sync-cache.c under GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception? > > Sriram, did you and Google intend to license config/i386/cpuinfo.c under > GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception?
Yes, the intention is to license under GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception. Thanks, Sri > > Richard, did you and Red Hat intend to license config/ia64/unwind-ia64.h > under GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception? > > DJ, did you and Red Hat intend to license config/mips/vr4120-div.S under > GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception? > > Once confirmed, I will apply this patch to all active branches: trunk, > gcc-4_8-branch and gcc-4_7-branch. > > Thank you, > > -- > Maxim Kuvyrkov > www.kugelworks.com > >
