On 03.08.2013 14:35, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Adam Butcher <a...@jessamine.co.uk>
wrote:
---
gcc/cp/pt.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index a7baaba..99bc71b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ determine_specialization (tree template_id,
tree decl_arg_types;
/* This is an ordinary member function. However, since
- we're here, we can assume it's enclosing class is a
+ we're here, we can assume its enclosing class is a
template class. For example,
template <typename T> struct S { void f(); };
@@ -4337,7 +4337,7 @@ check_default_tmpl_args (tree decl, tree
parms, bool is_primary,
|| DECL_INITIALIZED_IN_CLASS_P (decl)))
/* We already checked these parameters when the template was
declared, so there's no need to do it again now. This
function
- was defined in class scope, but we're processing it's body
now
+ was defined in class scope, but we're processing its body
now
that the class is complete. */
return true;
@@ -7482,7 +7482,7 @@ lookup_template_class_1 (tree d1, tree
arglist, tree in_decl, tree context,
the one of #0.
When we encounter #1, we want to store the partial
instantiation
- of M (template<class T> S<int>::M<T>) in it's
CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE.
+ of M (template<class T> S<int>::M<T>) in its
CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE.
For all cases other than this "explicit specialization of
member of a
class template", we just want to store the most general
template into
--
1.8.3
OK.
Do you have copyright assignment on file?
Yes. I only came across these as I was addressing one of Jason's
comments for my own bad grammar!
