On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > DR 1430 seems to be being resolved to prohibit passing a pack expansion to a > non-pack parameter of an alias template. I disagree with this direction, > but I'm going to go ahead and implement it for now.
I too disagree. Do we need a NB-level comment to get a reconsideration? > The second patch implements DR 1286, which allows an alias template to be > equivalent to another template if the type it aliases is the same as the > type of the other template. this was part of the original intent. I am mystified it was reversed. Thanks for doing it! -- Gaby
