Hi!

On the following testcase we ICE because we have an indirect (MEM_REF)
clobber stmt that uses anonymous SSA_NAME.  ipa-split.c (intentionally)
ignores clobber stmts because they don't result in executable code,
but that can lead into clobber stmts mentioning SSA_NAMEs that aren't
initialized.  For non-anonymous SSA_NAMEs that is not an issue, we just drop
those during tree-ssa-live.c later on (clobber stmts are always optional
and furthermore in ipa-split case the clobber stmts are duplicated both
in the (to be inlined) caller and callee), but for anonymous SSA_NAMEs
there is no such thing as (D) and thus we ICE.

Fixed by removing those clobber stmts already during function versioning
during ipa-split.c.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2013-08-13  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR tree-optimization/57661
        * tree-inline.h (struct copy_body_data): Add blocks_to_copy field.
        * tree-inline.c (tree_function_versioning): Initialize it.
        (remap_gimple_stmt): Return GIMPLE_NOP for MEM_REF lhs clobber stmts
        if id->blocks_to_copy and MEM_REF's SSA_NAME is defined in a block
        that is not being copied.

        * g++.dg/opt/pr57661.C: New test.

--- gcc/tree-inline.h.jj        2013-06-03 18:11:57.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/tree-inline.h   2013-07-23 00:38:14.362153447 +0200
@@ -115,6 +115,10 @@ typedef struct copy_body_data
   /* Entry basic block to currently copied body.  */
   basic_block entry_bb;
 
+  /* For partial function versioning, bitmap of bbs to be copied,
+     otherwise NULL.  */
+  bitmap blocks_to_copy;
+
   /* Debug statements that need processing.  */
   vec<gimple> debug_stmts;
 
--- gcc/tree-inline.c.jj        2013-07-06 09:24:10.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/tree-inline.c   2013-07-23 01:30:39.575893735 +0200
@@ -1387,6 +1387,23 @@ remap_gimple_stmt (gimple stmt, copy_bod
            }
        }
 
+      /* For *ptr_N ={v} {CLOBBER}, if ptr_N is SSA_NAME defined
+        in a block that we aren't copying during tree_function_versioning,
+        just drop the clobber stmt.  */
+      if (id->blocks_to_copy && gimple_clobber_p (stmt))
+       {
+         tree lhs = gimple_assign_lhs (stmt);
+         if (TREE_CODE (lhs) == MEM_REF
+             && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 0)) == SSA_NAME)
+           {
+             gimple def_stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (TREE_OPERAND (lhs, 0));
+             if (gimple_bb (def_stmt)
+                 && !bitmap_bit_p (id->blocks_to_copy,
+                                   gimple_bb (def_stmt)->index))
+               return gimple_build_nop ();
+           }
+       }
+
       if (gimple_debug_bind_p (stmt))
        {
          copy = gimple_build_debug_bind (gimple_debug_bind_get_var (stmt),
@@ -5091,6 +5108,7 @@ tree_function_versioning (tree old_decl,
   id.src_node = old_version_node;
   id.dst_node = new_version_node;
   id.src_cfun = DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (old_decl);
+  id.blocks_to_copy = blocks_to_copy;
   if (id.src_node->ipa_transforms_to_apply.exists ())
     {
       vec<ipa_opt_pass> old_transforms_to_apply
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr57661.C.jj       2013-07-23 01:42:45.078284916 
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr57661.C  2013-07-23 01:41:41.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+// PR tree-optimization/57661
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-forwprop -std=gnu++11" }
+
+template <typename>
+struct A
+{
+  ~A () {}
+};
+template <typename _Tp>
+using B = A <_Tp>;
+template <typename _Tp>
+class C : B <_Tp> {};
+namespace N { enum D { d }; }
+template <class>
+struct E
+{
+  ~E ();
+};
+template <class, class V>
+struct F : V {};
+template <class U, class V>
+struct G : F <U, V>
+{
+  N::D g1;
+  void g2 ();
+  void g3 ();
+  void g4 () { g3 (); }
+  static void g5 (G *__t) { __t->g4 (); }
+};
+template <class U, class V>
+struct H : G <U, V>
+{
+  E <U> *h1;
+  bool h2;
+  ~H () throw ()
+  {
+    this->g2 ();
+    if (h2)
+      delete h1;
+  }
+};
+template <class U, class V>
+struct I : H <U, V>, E <U>
+{
+  G <U, V> *i;
+  ~I () throw ()
+  {
+    i->g4 ();
+  }
+};
+struct J
+{
+  typedef C <char> j1;
+  typedef G <char, C <char>> j2;
+  J ();
+  j2 *j3;
+};
+struct K : J
+{
+  typedef G <char, C <char>> j2;
+  K () { j2::g5 (this->j3); }
+};
+template <class U, class V>
+void G <U, V>::g3 ()
+{
+  switch (g1)
+    {
+    case N::d:
+      {
+       I <U, V> *q = (I <U, V> *) this;
+       q->I <U, V>::~I ();
+      }
+    }
+}
+K r;

        Jakub

Reply via email to