On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:20 PM, David Malcolm <dmalc...@redhat.com> wrote: > * gimple.c (gt_ggc_mx (gimple)): New, as required by GTY((user)). > (gt_pch_nx (gimple)): Likewise.
GIMPLE isn't supposed to end up in a PCH. Can you please make this function simply call gcc_unreachable()? FWIW 1: I really think all these hand-written markers aren't a good idea, we should really figure out a way to have automatic marker function generators, something less complex than gengtype, of course. But to have all these calls to the type-mangled marker functions (gt_pch_n_9tree_node, etc.) is going to be a problem in the long term. It seems to me that the first step in all these conversions to hand-written markers should be to make gengtype spit out the marker functions *without* the type name mangling, i.e. all marker functions should just be gt_ggc_mx(type) / gt_pch_nx(type). Ciao! Steven
