Sorry, I should not have committed that new test along with this portion of the patch. Removed as of r202106. Teresa
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > Teresa Johnson <tejohn...@google.com> writes: > >> Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/inline-dump.c >> =================================================================== >> --- testsuite/gcc.dg/inline-dump.c (revision 0) >> +++ testsuite/gcc.dg/inline-dump.c (revision 0) >> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ >> +/* Verify that -fopt-info can output correct inline info. */ >> +/* { dg-do compile } */ >> +/* { dg-options "-Wall -fopt-info-inline=stderr -O2 -fno-early-inlining" } >> */ >> +static inline int leaf() { >> + int i, ret = 0; >> + for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) >> + ret += i; >> + return ret; >> +} >> +static inline int foo(void) { return leaf(); } /* { dg-message "note: >> leaf .*inlined into bar .*via inline instance foo.*\n" } */ > > I don't see that message, neither on ia64 nor m68k. > > Andreas. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org > GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 > "And now for something completely different." -- Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohn...@google.com | 408-460-2413