On 08/30/2013 05:06 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I should have explained some of that in better detail. The main issue I had yesterday, is that the pattern matching can easily become very difficult if not impossible: if you look at the second half of expand_default_init, in some cases we wrap the returned CALL_EXPR in a COND_EXPR
Ah, yes. Let's go with your first patch, then, rather than make the change in multiple places.
Jason
